143 Ohio App. 3d 91 - State v. Jeffers’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Dickess (2008), State v. Lee (2018)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Thompkins · State v. Waddy · 117 Ohio App. 3d 644 - State v. Green · 124 Ohio App. 3d 513 - State v. Kersey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the offender possessed a weapon that was capable of firing a projectile by means of an explosive or combustible propellant and was operable or could readily have been rendered operable at the time of the offense.* * * But R.C. 2923.11 (B)(2) provides that, in determining whether a weapon is capable of expelling a projectile, `the trier of fact may rely on circumstantial evidence, including, but not limited to, the representations and actions of the individual exercising control over the firearm.' Further, we have repeatedly held that a victim's belief that the weapon is a gun, together with the intent on the part of the accused to create and use that belief for his own criminal purposes, is sufficient to prove a firearm specification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'No, ma'am, if you don't hurry up, I'm going to blow your head off.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hill“threaten to inflict physical harm on another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.