State v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1,180 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · Johnson v. Zerbst · Johnson v. United States · United States v. Young
Cited together with Strickland v. Washington · State v. Barnes · State v. Long · State v. Thompkins · State v. Ruff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,180 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n accused's failure to raise the issue of allied offenses of similar import in the trial court forfeits all but plain error, and a forfeited error is not reversible error unless it affected the outcome of the proceeding and reversal is necessary to correct a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
29 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dean · State v. Austin“Notice of plain error under Crim.R. 52(B) is to be taken with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
25 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Yeager · State v. Dean“required to demonstrate a reasonable probability that the error resulted in prejudice-the same deferential standard for reviewing ineffective assistance of counsel claims.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fears · State v. Conley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.