Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 Or. 14 - Abrahamson v. Brett

Abrahamson v. Brett’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
6
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

1 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2022

1 district · 13 state decisions

601933194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Triest & Co. v. Goldstone · McCartney ex rel. First National Bank v. Kipp · Clark v. Billings · Maddox v. Wescott · Miles v. Bowers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Where a subletting or assignment of the leased premises without the consent of the lessor is prohibited, [the lessor] may arbitrarily withhold his assent without giving any reasons, and in granting his assent may impose such conditions as he sees fit."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * the action shall be commenced and tried in the county in which the defendants, or either of them, reside or may be found at the commencement of the action; * * * provided further, that if none of the defendants resides in this state *Page 375 the action may be tried in any county which plaintiff may designate in his complaint." O.C.L.A. § 1-403.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"[w]here a subletting or assignment of the leased premises without the consent of [the landlord] is prohibited, [the landlord] may arbitrarily withhold [its consent] without giving any reasons, and in granting [its consent] may impose such conditions as [it] sees fit."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.