Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 P3D 975 - Morgan v. Morgan

Morgan v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Laing v. Laing · Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. Stepanoff · Dewey v. Dewey · Farrell Ex Rel. Farrell v. Dome Laboratories · Village of Chefornak v. Hooper Bay Construction Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (8) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[the motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2) and (8) not more than one year after the date of notice of the judgment or orders....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.