Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

143 Pa. Super. 421

18 A.2d 112

Ralston v. Cunningham

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 1940

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1940-12-13

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1951

5 state decisions

Relies on 143 Pa. Super. 412 - Ralston v. Cunningham

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1940-12-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

¶2 This is a companion case to Ralston et al., Appellants, v. Cunningham et al., 143 Pa. Superior Ct. 412, 18 A. 2d 108. The appellees in that case are the appellants here. A petition for the allowance of counsel fee was filed in the court below on behalf of appellants under section 17 of the Act of June 2, 1937, P. L. 1198, 43 PS §206q, which provides : “Upon denial by the court of any injunctive relief sought in an action involving or growing out of a labor dispute, the court shall order the complainant to pay reasonable costs and expenses of defending the suit and a reasonable counsel fee.” The petition was dismissed by the court below.

¶3 For the reasons stated in our opinion in Ralston et al., Appellants, v. Cunningham et al., supra, the order of the court below is affirmed, at the costs of appellants herein.

/143/pasuper/421 · .json · Public domain