143 Pa. Super. 87 - Christman v. Segal’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““In seeking toilet facilities plaintiff was still an invitee and defendant continued to owe her the duty of reasonable care. It is commonly known that lavatory ' and toilet facilities are available - in department stores generally, for the accomodation of patrons, and one using them does not surrender his status as an invitee, for ordinarily, such facilities are as much a part of the premises to which patrons are invited as a floor devoted to the display and sale, of merchandise. * * * ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Winn-Dixie, Montgomery, Inc. v. Cox

2. ““In seeking toilet facilities plaintiff was still an invitee [business visitor] and defendant continued to owe her the duty of reasonable care. .... She was not informed, if it be the fact as defendant testified, that the toilet room in this store was maintained for the accommodation of employees only and not for patrons of the store. But even if the use was permissive merely, that fact did not affect plaintiff’s status as an invitee [business visitor].””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 160 Pa. Super. 236 - McCoy v. Fleisher Industrial Center, Inc.