Marquez v. Le Blanc’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 1967
1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dick v. Gravel Logging Co. · McCarthy v. Souther · Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co. · Burt v. Davis-Wood Lumber Co. · Pyyny v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In contrast to these decisions we have the opinions in certain damage suits, examples of which are Moffet v. Koch, 106 La. 371 , 375, 31 So. 40 ; Robideaux v. Hebert et al., 118 La. [1089] 1090, 1095, 43 So. 887 , 12 L.R.A.(N.S.) 632; Abate et al. v. Hirdes et al., 9 La.App. 688 , 121 So. 775 ; Shea v. Reems, 36 La.Ann. 966 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it was left to his own volition to choose the means of transportation to perform the services that were required of him”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“as an expense allowance incidental to the operation of his automobile”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.