Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 SO2D 673 - Trieste v. Anchell

Trieste v. Anchell’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 1982
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 1982

7 state decisions

30196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 129 So. 2d 133 - City of Lakeland v. Catinella · 120 So. 2d 596 - Port Everglades Terminal Co. v. Canty · Burns v. City of Fort Lauderdale · Gary v. Marion County · Le Forgeais v. Erwin-Newman Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The treating physician testified that while claimant could not work as a carpenter, he could do some type of work. Claimant testified that he had not tried to work at any job, although he had tried to do odd jobs around his landlady’s house and had been unable to do them. He stated that he might be able to hold a job ‘if it is sitting down part of the time and standing up part of the time.’ He stated that he had been to the Florida State Employment Service about two weeks prior to the hearing at which he testified but they had nothing for him. “Claimant’s landlady and a friend testified as to what claimant could and could not do as they had observed him.” “In the instant case claimant made no effort to obtain employment until about two weeks prior to the hearing. There is no evidence that there is no market for the labor which he can perform. As the full commission pointed out, there was a dearth of evidence ‘by any witness qualified to evaluate claimant’s employment potential.’ ” (p. 675)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Claimant has not established by competent substantial evidence his inability to do any work uninterruptedly so as to warrant placing upon the carrier the burden of showing that there was available work which claimant could perform."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"there was a dearth of evidence `by any witness qualified to evaluate claimant's employment potential.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.