Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 SO2D 700 - Collins v. State

Collins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
6
states following
January 2009
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably United States v. Montos (1970), Stevenson v. State (1980)

4 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

18019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. United States · Agnello v. United States · Amos v. United States · Dorsey v. United States · Compagna v. Hiatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... A private citizen does have the common law right to arrest a person who commits a felony in his presence, or to arrest a person where a felony has been committed, and where the arresting citizen has probable cause to believe, and does believe, the person arrested to be guilty. Even though there was time to obtain a warrant, a private citizen may make such an arrest and justify his failure to obtain a warrant by proving the person arrested was actually guilty of the felony... ." (Emphasis added.)”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The actions of the police officers, which culminated in the arrest, search and seizure, extended over a period of two days. All of these actions, while in the City of West Palm Beach, were consistent with their duties and under their power and authority as police officers. Their previous interrogations with Collins had been as police officers, and their presence at the door of the motel room, in the uniform signifying their official position as police officers, was a part of their continuing investigation begun as police officers. They were acting under color of their office. We conclude that Collins admitted them to the motel room by virtue of the force and effect of their official position as police officers. He did not admit them as private citizens. An officer gaining access to private living quarters under color of his office and of the law which he personifies must then have some valid basis in law for the intrusion. Id. at 703 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “is inalienable and must be protected at the risk that an individual criminal may go without punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.