Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 SO2D 715 - Hardcastle v. Mobley

Hardcastle v. Mobley’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 446 So. 2d 1162 - Wright v. Yurko (1984), Page v. Staley (1969)

27 state decisions

130196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 89 So. 2d 482 - Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc. · 93 So. 2d 112 - Cleveland Trust Company v. Foster · 81 So. 2d 645 - Herring v. Eiland · Pritchard v. Peppercorn and Peppercorn, Inc. · 135 So. 2d 750 - Siciliano v. Hunerberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is not sufficient in defense of a motion for summary judgment to rely on the paper issues created by the pleadings, but it is incumbent upon the party moved against to submit evidence to rebut the motion for summary judgment and affidavits in support thereof or the court will presume that he had gone as far as he could and a summary judgment could be properly entered."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In the trial court, defendants attempted, by filing affidavits in opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary decree, to show that the property was held by Foster subject to a resulting trust, of which Wentz was beneficiary. The affidavit of Foster was not served upon opposing counsel until the hearing on the motion for summary decree. Objection was made by counsel to the consideration of this affidavit, and this objection, of course, should have been sustained under the Rules... . Rule 1.36(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., provides in part, in connection with a motion for summary judgment or decree: "The motion shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing. The adverse party prior to the day of the hearing may serve opposing affidavits * * *." [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the party moved against by summary judgment * * * must come forward with facts contradicting those submitted by the movant and demonstrating a real issue between the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.