Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 SO2D 821 - Mobley v. State

Mobley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1986

8 state decisions

30196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cherry Lake Farms, Inc. v. Love · Petroutsa v. H. C. Schrader Co. · 73 So. 2d 51 - Daoud v. Matz · State v. Mobley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We think it essential to the orderly dispensation of justice that a defendant be apprised, under the rules of procedure, of the regulation of which violation is alleged. The requirement imposes no hardship upon the prosecution and affords to the defendant a reasonable safeguard of his liberties. It is our view that in those instances in which the court should by reason of statute or otherwise take judicial notice of a rule, regulation or order of an administrative agency of the State, the federal government or politicial subdivision thereof, or an ordinance of a municipality, that the pertinent text of such rule, regulation, order or ordinance should be made to appear as a part of the record in the trial court."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 351 So. 2d 50 - Poirier v. DIV. OF HEALTH, STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERV. · 272 So. 2d 473 - Freimuth v. State
  2. “contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 272 So. 2d 473 - Freimuth v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.