Proctor v. Proctor’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 401 (Self-Employed Individuals Tax Retirement Act of 1962)
Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · Armstrong v. Armstrong · 639 So. 2d 909 - Hemsley v. Hemsley · 418 So. 2d 764 - McKee v. McKee · 614 So. 2d 394 - Smith v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fee depends on consideration of, in addition to the relative financial ability of the parties, the skill and standing of the attorney employed, the nature of the case and' novelty and difficulty of the questions at issue, as well as -the degree of responsibility involved in the manage-mént of the cause, the time and labor required, the usual and customary charge in the community,- and the preclusion of other employment by the attorney due to the acceptance of the easel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'In the case of a claimed inadequacy of alimony, the appellate court will interfere only where the decision is seen as so oppressive, unjust[,] or grossly inadequate as to evidence an abuse of discretion.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.