Celestine v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · 584 So. 2d 786 - Grubb v. State · 562 So. 2d 1206 - Riely v. State · McClinton v. State · 942 So. 2d 231 - Carbin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the following requirements ... must be met in order for due procéss to have been provided in revocation hearings: (a) Written notice of the claimed violations of probation or parole; (b) disclosure to the probationer or parolee of evidence ágainst him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present'witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right.to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses .(unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a neutral and detached hearing body such as a traditional parole board, members of which need not be judicial officers or lawyers; and (f)' a written statement by the fact finders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking probation or parole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.