Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 SO3D 754 - Baker v. Miller

Baker v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co. · Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, S. A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc. · Missouri v. Jenkins · Forshey v. Principi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “”[a]ppellate review doés riot consist of • supine submission to erroneous legal concepts even though none of the parties declaimed the applicable law below. .Our duty is to enunciate the law on the record facts. Neither the parties nor the trial judge, by agreement or passivity; can force us to abdicate our appellate responsibility.'"””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.