Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 SW3D 206 - Smith v. Smith

Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 13th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. Packer · Worford v. Stamper · Davis v. Huey · Carle v. Carle · Murff v. Murff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [b]ecause the debt owed by a spouse is a legally relevant factor in dividing the community estate, a trial court may abuse its discretion if it fails to consider such a factor.... The record does not disclose the amount of these debts, so the court could not have considered the amount of these debts in dividing the community estate ... Although the court need not divide the community estate equally, a disproportionate division must be supported by some reasonable basis.... Having reviewed the record, we find no reasonable basis for the disproportionate division of the community assets and the liabilities of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.