Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 SW3D 305 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 18th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The credibility of a witness may be attacked or supported by evidence in the form of opinion or reputation, but subject to these limitations: (1) the evidence may refer only to character for truthfulness or untruthfulness, and (2) evidence of truthful character is admissible only after the character of the witness for truthfulness has been attacked by opinion or reputation evidence or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A person commits an offense if the person ... intentionally or knowingly threatens another with imminent bodily injury, including the person's spouse....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person elected, selected, appointed, employed, or otherwise designated as . . . an officer, employee, or agent of government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re SC

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.