State v. Shores’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Rhode Island v. Innis · Fahy v. Connecticut · California v. Prysock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“— You may remain silent. — Anything you say can be used against you in court. — You may refuse to answer any questions asked of you at any time. •— If you cannot afford an attorney and want one, you can contact a Public Defender or one will be contacted for you before questioning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dustin“[t]o establish harmless error, the State, as the beneficiary of the error, must establish beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that there was overwhelming evidence to support the conviction; and (2) that the evidence in question did not in any way contribute to the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kilborn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.