Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 WASHAPP 807 - Chee Chew v. Lord

Chee Chew v. Lord’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 657 - Berg v. Hudesman · 109 Wash. 2d 107 - Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System · State v. Garcia · Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co. · Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This exception to the compulsory counterclaim requirement necessarily encompasses a claim that depends upon the outcome of some other lawsuit and thus does not come into existence until the action upon which it is based has terminated. ... However, a counterclaim will not be denied treatment as a compulsory counterclaim solely because recovery on it depends on the outcome of the main action. This approach seems sound when the counterclaim is based on pre-action events and only the right to relief depends upon the outcome of the main action.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] judicial declaration that the waiver created a promise that Lord would indemnify Chew against any judgment entered in the Nevada action did not depend on the outcome of the Nevada action. Such a declaratory claim will not be denied treatment as a compulsory counterclaim solely because recovery on a judgment depends on the outcome of the main action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]t that time, [Chew] had already incurred legal costs associated with defending the Nevada action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.