Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 143 Wis. 2d 728 - State v. Sugden

143 Wis. 2d 728 - State v. Sugden’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2009

15 state decisions

60198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 25 Wash. App. 635 - State v. Bryant · 137 Wis. 2d 367 - State v. Sugden · Cope v. Commonwealth · Scott v. State · 67 Mich. App. 481 - People v. Quintero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f it is appropriate in terms of correctional or penal policy to segregate some persons in locked detention facilities, it is that custody that is sought to be maintained, and it is the escape from that facility or custody that should be punished as escape. If the escape statute is interpreted to mean that the act is not complete unless the inmate goes over the outer walls, the deterrent from breaking out of secure special custody is minimized.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “per se of an institution is not directly related to its geographical outer boundaries. There may be custody without the walls and custody of various kinds, without limitation, within the walls. Hence, from the face of the statute as juxtaposed against the facts here, it is apparent that the locked cottage where Sugden was held constituted”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The issue presented here is whether the word, `custody,' as used in the escape statute pertains only to the general geographical boundary of a particular state penal institution or pertains also to secure custodial facilities that are located within such an institution and to which prisoners may be confined.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.