¶1Appellant landlord sued appellee tenant for unpaid rent. Appellee denied the indebtedness and counterclaimed for breach of contract, alleging that appellant failed to make certain repairs requisite to obtaining a license to operate the premises as a day home for children of working mothers. The court, sitting without a jury, found for appellee on the original suit and for appellant on the counterclaim. Several errors are alleged, but from a study of the record, it is clear that the case involved factual issues. During argument in the trial court, counsel for appellant stated:
“Well, all I’d care to say is that there is a square issue of fact here, of course, as to what this rental agreement was. It was oral. The defendant [appellee] contends that it included the promise to do certain things. The testimony of the plaintiff [appellant] is to the contrary.”
¶2These issues were resolved by the trial court and there are no questions of law for our determination.
¶3Affirmed.