Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 A.2d 774 - White v. Luber

White v. Luber’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2006

1 district · 11 state decisions

40195819601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Pennsylvania v. Nelson · Dewey v. Clark · Subin v. Goldsmith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It has . . . been held that where facts were peculiarly within the knowledge of the defense and a matter such as good faith was involved, summary judgment should not be granted on the basis of a defense affidavit (though no counter-affidavit was filed), and that plaintiff was entitled to cross-examine opponent’s witnesses and have the trial court observe their demeanor. Alvado v. General Motors Corporation, 2 Cir., 229 F.2d 408 , cer-tiorari denied 351 U.S. 983 , 76 S.Ct. 1050 , 100 L.Ed. 1497 .” White v. Lu-ber, 144 A.2d 774, 776 (1958).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.