Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 Ariz. 591 - State v. Perkins

State v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably State v. Robinson (1987), State v. Carter (1985)

1 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

3401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · Solem v. Helm · Rummel v. Estelle · 66 Ill. 2d 551 - People v. King · Neal v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he teachings of Noble and Shulark are summed up in the emphasis in both cases on whether the criminal conduct “was directed to the accomplishment of a single criminal objective,” Noble , or whether the conduct was “part of a continuous series of criminal acts,” Shulark . The factors of time, place and number of victims are to be considered in assessing this criminal conduct, but A.R.S § 13-604(H), in recognizing that separate crimes can be committed on “the same occasion,” does not make much sense if these factors alone are determinative.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] vague and potentially open-ended conspiracy to commit whatever crimes can be committed is alone insufficient to unite apparently distinct crimes. We find no error with the consecutive sentences imposed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Convictions for two or more offenses committed on the same occasion shall be counted as only one conviction for purposes of this section.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.