In Re Richmond’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2011
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 707
Relies on Zolg v. Kelly · In Re Charles Ellsworth Krohn AKA Charles E. Krohn, Appellant/debtor · Green v. Staples · In re Walton · United States Trustee v. Harris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In re Krohn, 886 F.2d 123, 126 (6th Cir.1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.