144 Cal. App. 4th 1000 - People v. Mesa’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Griffin v. California · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Satterwhite v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Strickland 'reasonable probability' standard applies to the evaluation of a Sixth Amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, even when defense counsel's alleged error involves the failure to preserve the defendant's federal constitutional rights. (E.g., People v. Ledesma [ (1987) ] 43 Cal.3d [171,] 208-209, 217, 233 Cal.Rptr. 404 , 729 P.2d 839 [applying Strickland's 'reasonable probability' test for prejudice to defense counsel's alleged deficiencies, including failure to protect defendant's Fourth Amendment rights by filing suppression motion directed to telephone call intercepted by police after warrantless entry of defendant's residence]; In re Avena (1996) 12 Cal.4th 694 , 721-722, 731, 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 413 , 909 P.2d 1017 [applying Strickland standard to counsel's failure to object to defense counsel's waiver of defendant's right not to appear before jury in jail clothes]; see People v. Gonzalez (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 432 , 437, 75 Cal.Rptr.2d 272 (opn. of Johnson, J.).)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.