Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 CONN 629 - Cole v. Steinlauf

Cole v. Steinlauf’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2017

19 state decisions

801957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chappell v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad · Frank Towers Corp. v. Laviana · Chamberlain v. Thompson · New Haven Trust Co. v. Camp · Farrel Foundry v. Dart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] deed purporting on its face to have been attested in another state, in the absence of anything in it to the contrary, will be deemed, prima facie, to have been executed, acknowledged and delivered in that state, thus making General Statutes § 47-17 [previously § 7087] prima facie applicable. . . . The effect of 7087 is to provide that a deed purporting to convey land in Connecticut, if executed and acknowledged in, and according to the laws of, a foreign state, will be treated as validly executed and acknowledged even though the execution and acknowledgment may not be in conformity with the law of Connecticut. . . . The effect of the statute is limited to curing defects in the form or manner of execution or acknowledgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.