Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 CONNAPP 387 - State v. Ruffin

State v. Ruffin’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · State v. Williams · Dennis v. California · State v. Singh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Was the language used manifestly intended to be, or was it of such character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify? ... Further, in applying this test, we must look to the context in which the statement was made in order to determine the manifest intention which prompted it and its natural and necessary impact upon the jury.... Finally, [w]e also recognize that the limits of legitimate argument and fair comment cannot be determined precisely by rule and line, and something must be allowed for the zeal of counsel in the heat of argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.