Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 F.1d 381 - Barber v. Coit

Barber v. Coit’s Empirical Analysis

144 F. 381 · 1906

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
December 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank · Githens v. Shiffler · Lansing Boiler & Engine Works v. Ryerson · Mansfield & Sandusky City Rail Road v. John P. Veeder & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the creditors [would] lose nothing they are justly entitled to by giving up the money [to Spartan], for they have the property and it would be manifestly inequitable for them to hold both property and money.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.