Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 F.1d 503 - In re Maher

In re Maher’s Empirical Analysis

144 F. 503 · 1906

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2013
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2013

4 federal appellate · 7 district ·

70190619101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co. · Randolph v. Scruggs · Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank · Kaufman v. Tredway · Blennerhassett v. Sherman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a preferential transfer the fraud is constructive or technical, consisting in the infraction of that rule of equal distribution among all creditors which it: is the policy of the law to enforce when all cannot be fully paid.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.