Ex parte Moran’s Empirical Analysis
144 F. 594 · 1906
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1940
3 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Royall · Ex parte Siebold · Ex Parte Tyler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The writ of habeas corpus shall in no case extend to a prisoner in jail unless where he is * * * in custody in violation of the Constitution or of a law or treaty of the United States.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Connella v. Haskell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.