Madden v. McKenzie’s Empirical Analysis
144 F. 64 · 1906
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1951
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona Railroad · White v. Lyons · McGee v. Currie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Code of Civil Procedure of Alaska, while in the main it follows closely the Code of Oregon, differs essentially from it in the particular that it provides: “ 'The distinction between actions at law and suits in equity and the forms of all such actions and suits are abolished. There shall be but' one form of action for the protection of private rights and the redress and prevention of private wrongs, which is denominated a civil action.’ Carter’s Codes of Alaska, p. 145, § 1 [Code Civ.Proc.].””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.