Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 F.1d 907 - Schafer v. Craft

Schafer v. Craft’s Empirical Analysis

144 F. 907 · 1906

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
November 1932
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1932

5 federal appellate ·

501906191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. Blakeslee · Northern Pacific Railroad v. Clark · In re Kinney · In re Kearns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Upon tho most familiar principles one cannot by suit recover any taxes once paid, which, in fact were due even though the exact manner of their collection was not authorized.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.