Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

144 F.2d 250

Docket No. 10821.

Hood v. Johnston

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1944.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1944-07-12

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1944-07-12

¶1Carl Hood, in pro. per.

¶2Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., and Joseph Karesh, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before GARRECHT, DENMAN, and MATHEWS, Judges.

¶4*251PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the appeal in above cause be dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly and the mandate of this Court in this cause issue forthwith.

/144/f2d/250 · .json · Public domain