144 F.2d 259 - Reilly v. Millis — 144 F.2d 259

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1962

5 federal appellate · 4 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Mr. Nicholas J. Chase, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Robert E. Lynch, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. John J. Donnelly, Jr., of Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellants.

¶2Mr. Charles F. McErlean, of Washington,D. C., Attorney, with whom Messrs. Alvin J. Rockwell, General Counsel, and Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, both of Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees.

¶3Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and EDGERTON and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Plaintiffs below are twenty employees of the City National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago. They ask for a mandatory injunction to set aside and expunge from the records of the National Labor Relations Board a Direction of Election and certification of the collective bargaining representatives of their group. The court below dismissed the complaint.

¶6 The National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., does not provide for a review of the proceedings of the Board in connection with the investigation and certification of representatives for collective bargaining except after the Board has entered a final order based on the facts certified in such proceedings. The certification itself is not such an order. The complaint on its face does not show that plaintiffs are threatened with irreparable injury as a consequence of the certification. They make no showing of any special circumstances which make the review provided by statute an inadequate remedy for the matters set out in their complaint.

¶7The judgment of the court below will be affirmed on the authority of American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 1940, 308 U.S. 401, at page 411, 412, 60 S.Ct. 300, at page 305, 84 L.Ed. 347. See also Switchmen's Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 1943, 320 U.S. 297, 64 S.Ct. 95; Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. United Transport Service Employees of America, 1943, 320 U.S. 715, 64 S.Ct. 260, reversing Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees v. United Transport Service Employees of America, 1943, 78 U.S.App.D.C. 125, 137 F.2d 817; Employers Group of Motor Freight Carriers, Inc., v. National War Labor Board, No. 8680, - U.S.App.D.C. -, 143 F.2d 145.