Hoover Co. v. Coe’s Empirical Analysis
144 F.2d 514 · 1944
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
April 1945
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Butterworth v. United States ex rel. Hoe · Hill v. Wooster · Radtke Patents Corp. v. Coe · International Cellucotton Products Co. v. Coe · Butler v. Shaw
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether [R. S. 4915] confers jurisdiction on the District Court to enter a decree which does not determine the right of the applicant to receive a patent but which instead directs the examiner to allow claims for the purpose of provoking subsequent interference proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hoover Co. v. Coe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.