Young v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
144 F.3d 1298 · 1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2011
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Relies on Green. v. Nottingham · Young v. Edknight
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Moreover, a review of previously-filed cases by Young indicates two prior dismissals for failure to state a claim. See Young v. Knight, No. 96-3485-GTV (D.Kan. Nov. 15, 1996) (dismissing the claim of mental anguish for failure to state a claim); Young v. Knight, 113 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir. 1997) (agreeing with the district court, finding the claim for mental anguish failed to state a claim for relief, and counting the appellate dismissal as a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Young v. Miller“the district court erred in granting Young's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and th[e] appeal was not properly filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dubuc v. Johnson“in imminent danger of serious physical injury, he cannot proceed under the in forma pauperis provisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dubuc v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.