Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 F.3d 1393 - United States v. Guapi

United States v. Guapi’s Empirical Analysis

144 F.3d 1393 · 1998

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2021

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

1201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · Florida v. Bostick · Ohio v. Robinette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable person ... would not have felt free to disregard [the agents'] requests without some positive indication that consent could have been refused,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the complete lack of any notification to the passengers that they were in fact free to decline the search request.... Providing [this] simple notification ... is perhaps the most efficient and effective method to ensure compliance with the Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “has specifically rejected the notion that police officers must always inform citizens of their right to refuse when seeking permission to conduct a warrantless consent search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.