77695 Williams Chicago Housing Authority’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Colon v. Option One Mortgage Corp. (2003), Middle Tennessee News Co. v. Charnel of Cincinnati, Inc. (2001)
7 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Robert John Love, Debtor-Appellant · United States Brass Corporation · 158 Ill. 2d 98 - Midland Management Co. v. Helgason · Mendoza v. Temple-Inland Mortgage Corp. · 69 Ill. 2d 1 - Avdich v. Kleinert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) Except as provided in sections 765 and 766 of this title and in subsections (b), (c), and (d) of this section, the trustee, subject to the court’s approval, may assume or reject any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“§ 1322. Contents of plan (b) Subject to subsections (a) and (c) of this section, the plan may (7) subject to section 365 of this title, provide for the assumption, rejection, or assignment of any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor not previously rejected under such section;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a desire to permit an action to proceed to completion in another tribunal,”. or certain creditors may have claims that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.