Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 F.3d 719 - Rivera v. Allin

Rivera v. Allin’s Empirical Analysis

144 F.3d 719 · 1998

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2023 · most notably Jones v. Bock (2007), Alexander v. Hawk (1998)

38 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions

6901998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Neitzke v. Williams · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Bounds v. Smith · Boddie v. Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Congress did not enact the PLRA in a vacuum. It held hearings and rendered findings, concluding that prisoners file more frivolous lawsuits than any other class of persons.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A claim that fails to allege the requisite exhaustion of remedies is tantamount to one that fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.