Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 F.3d 847 - LaShawn A. ex rel. Moore v. Barry

LaShawn A. ex rel. Moore v. Barry’s Empirical Analysis

144 F.3d 847 · 1998

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2018

4 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

110199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Hanna v. Plumer · Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The term `state' in the Eleventh Amendment also has been interpreted to include Puerto Rico, see De Leon Lopez v. Corporacion Insular de Seguros, 931 F.2d 116 , 121 (1st Cir.1991), but not the District of Columbia. See LaShawn A. v. Barry, 87 F.3d 1389 , 1394 n. 4 (D.C.Cir.1996). (en banc)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the least possible power adequate to the end proposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.