Michael v. Horn’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Offutt v. United States · Calderon v. Thompson · Bell v. Thompson · American Iron & Steel Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“le[ft] the District Court with little guidance in this complicated case as to our reasons for remanding the case for further proceedings and, indeed, [did] not identify what error (if any) the District Court committed in connection with the decision appealed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Michael v. Horn“anything but steadfast in his desire to terminate this appeal or my representation of him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Michael v. Horn“beyond the scope of our certificate of appealability.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Michael v. Horn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.