¶1 Arthur Thacker appeals from the magistrate judge’s order * dismissing his action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thacker v. Brady Servs., Inc., No. CA-03-1160-1 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED
*
¶3 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).