Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 Fla. 1 - Caples v. Taliaferro

Caples v. Taliaferro’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Holland v. Fort Pierce Financing & Construction Co. (1946), Watson v. Holland (1944)

7 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

9019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Banks v. Ogden · Brickell v. Trammel · White's Bank of Buffalo v. . Nichols · Smith v. Horn · Haberman v. . Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It may be regarded as settled that title to all submerged lands whether tide or fresh is held by the states in trust for all the people of the respective states, that such trust is governmental and may not be completely alienated but that in the interest of all the people, the States may grant to individuals limited privileges or rights in such lands.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]here the fee to a street along a river front is in the abutting owner, the title to accretions will be in him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[A] riparian owner may separate his uplands from his submerged lands,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.