Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 F. Supp. 3d 1185 - Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corp.

144 F. Supp. 3d 1185 - Memory Integrity, LLC v. Intel Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Ashcroft v. al-Kidd · Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department · Lee v. City of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). This requirement, that the post-knowledge actions teach an infringing use, ensures that "ordinary acts incident to product distribution, such as offering customers technical support or product updates, will not support inducement liability in themselves.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “far beyond considering whether the defendant continued to sell the allegedly infringing products”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “only establish[ed] that [the defendant] described features of the company's own products”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.