Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 FSUPP3D 1251 - Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com

Milo & Gabby, LLC v. Amazon.com’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 3D Systems, Inc. v. Aarotech Laboratories, Inc. · Rotec Industries Inc v. Mitsubishi Corporation Tucker Associates Inc Garry Tucker Mitsubishi International Corporation · MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Materials Silicon Corp. · Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Contractors USA, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “communicate that it was willing to enter into a bargain to sell the * * * products.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.