State v. Iona.’s Empirical Analysis
2019
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Illinois v. Caballes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“invalid unless and until the prosecution proves that the search or seizure falls within a well-recognized and narrowly defined exception to the warrant requirement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Kanoa“If the prosecution fails to meet this burden, the evidence obtained from the illegal search will be suppressed as 'fruit of the poisonous tree.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Kanoa“[T]he subject matter and intensity of the investigative detention must be limited to that which is justified by the initial stop.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Figueroa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.