Ware v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
November 1951
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rodgers v. Rodgers · Rowell v. Rowell · Kendall v. Kendall · Harris v. Harris · Kaestner v. Kaestner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the mother of minor children seeks to compel their father to contribute to their future support and education, and obtains personal service on him in an independent action in the same county in which she had previously obtained a divorce from him, based on publication service only, she is not restricted to the supplemental proceedings in the divorce action specified in R. S. 60-1510, but may maintain such an independent action against him for such purpose.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Effland v. Effland““Even if everything desired herein could be done and cared for in the original case, we have not been persuaded that the plaintiff would be prohibited by statute or otherwise from pursuing another course.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Effland v. Effland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.