State v. Millhaubt’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 1999
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ellis v. United States · Minner v. United States · State v. Rogers · State v. Miller · State ex rel. Coleman v. Rose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Sedgwick comity has over 100,000 population, hence is governed by R. S. 43-135 to R. S. 43-150, inclusive, the provisions of which refer solely to petit jurors. Under the last-mentioned statutes, a different method of making up the jury list obtains (compare R. S. 43-101 to 43-106, inclusive, with R. S. 43-136), . . (p. 577)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Theus““The matter of requiring a bill of particulars in a criminal case is discretionary and when no abuse of discretion is shown no error is committed in refusing such bill.” (Syl. ¶ 3.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gordon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.