Clark v. Layman’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1976
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Snehoda v. First National Bank in Wichita · First National Bank v. Schruben · State ex rel. Taggart v. Addison · Rakestraw v. State Highway Commission · Lux v. Columbian Fruit Canning Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Once a cause of action has been prosecuted to final judgment, all matters pertaining thereto and which were or properly should have been litigated under the facts constituting such cause of action are conclusively determined by that judgment and binding upon all parties to the litigation and their privies.” (p. 421.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lins v. Eads
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.