Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 LA 545 - Amacker v. Kent

Amacker v. Kent’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 1985 · most notably Darden v. Cox (1960), Jeffries v. Moore (1951)

28 state decisions

8019191920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If it be found that they have agreed upon all those matters which, in law, constitute a contract of partnership, it must be presumed that they intended that contract. If, on the other hand, some essential element to that contract is omitted, it is not a contract of partnership, no matter what it may be called.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`Art. 2813. A participation in the profits of a partnership carries with it a liability to contribute between the parties to the expenses and losses. * * *'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.