Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 144 LA 916 - Cole v. Grant

Cole v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1961
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schroeder v. Collins · State ex rel. I. X. L. Grocery Co. v. Land

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A laborer has been held, by various courts, in a restricted sense, to be one who performs manual labor, menial or physical exertion, labor, or toil, not requiring special accuracy, knowledge, skill or training, for hire or wages, under the direction of his employer, master or superior, and hence distinguished from an artisan, professional man, or skilled workman”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.